Elliott Wave
Counts wave structure across several timeframes at once and, for every count it keeps, names the price level that would prove that count wrong.
runs on M15 · H1 · H4 · D · W
How it reads a chart
- 1Label the structure on the higher timeframe first, so the lower-timeframe reading inherits its context.
- 2Keep the alternate counts rather than committing to one, each carrying its own weighting.
- 3Publish the invalidation level for each count alongside the zone it projects toward.
- 4Render a chart per timeframe so the labelling can be checked against the bars it came from.
What lands on the card
- A primary count plus the alternates our system also tracks, each with a weighting.
- An invalidation level and a projected target zone per count.
- A chart carousel across the timeframes the run covered.
Where it goes quiet
- Some wave reads are description-only: they carry no target-and-invalidation pair at all. Those are labelled “read only” on the wall and excluded from every statistic in the track record — that is neither a win nor a loss, simply not a claim the record can grade.
- A count is a reading of structure, not a forecast. The alternates exist because more than one labelling usually fits the same bars.
Tracked outcomes
No outcomes tracked for this method yet. Every read it publishes is graded to a win, a loss or an expiry, and appears here once the first ones resolve.
CAT is an educational community. Every analysis shows how our system reads a chart — it is not investment advice and not financial advice, not a recommendation to buy or sell, and carries no performance promise. Trading involves substantial risk of loss.