Elliott Wave + ZTD
Two reads on one card, kept separate. The Elliott Wave engine counts the structure across daily, 4-hour and 1-hour, and Zero-Touch Divergence reports its own divergence bias on the timeframe you asked for — its wrong-beyond level, and where it aims.
runs on H1 · H4
How it reads a chart
- 1The Elliott Wave engine counts the structure on each timeframe and publishes the level that would prove each count wrong.
- 2Zero-Touch Divergence checks the timeframe you asked about for its own bias, on its own chart.
- 3Both are published as they stand. Neither read is rewritten to agree with the other, and nothing is drawn on the wave charts.
What lands on the card
- The Elliott Wave carousel and its counts, exactly as the Elliott Wave method publishes them.
- A separate Zero-Touch Divergence section: the bias, its invalidation and its target — or a plain statement that it holds no bias on this timeframe right now.
- A ZTD chart slide of its own, whenever a bias is live.
Where it goes quiet
- The two halves can disagree, and the card will show both. Reconciling them is the reader's job, not the system's — neither method is weighted above the other here.
- Either half can come back with nothing: a wave count with no scenario, or no live ZTD bias. The card says so honestly rather than inventing a level that isn't there.
Tracked outcomes
No outcomes tracked for this method yet. Every read it publishes is graded to a win, a loss or an expiry, and appears here once the first ones resolve.
CAT is an educational community. Every analysis shows how our system reads a chart — it is not investment advice and not financial advice, not a recommendation to buy or sell, and carries no performance promise. Trading involves substantial risk of loss.